Merged. Thanks!

Additionally the output is directly written into the file users.txt where it is expected to be according to the subsequent git-svn clone command.

What for? The paragraph below says "redirect that output into your users.txt file". Do you think that a reader don't know how to redirect output into a file?
If you change some code snippet then change its description accordingly!

Hum, I had a look at the German translation where it says "Anschließend wird die Ausgabe in die Datei users.txt umgeleitet" which means "Afterwards the output is redirected to the file users.txt file".
So I assumed the command should also do this.
But you are correct in the English (aka the original) version it commands the user to do so by himself.
Do you want the German paragraph to match the English meaning better and then to remove the redirect to users.txt again?

I am not against describing the action and adding the redirect in the command. Not all users know how to redirect the output of a command into a file.

Do you want <...> to remove the redirect to users.txt again?

Yep. I do think that your changeset is a regression.
For me it makes perfect sense to first look at the output of this code snippet and then if it looks fine redirect it to users.txt.

Please have a look at merge request #381